Friday, February 25, 2011

The Genius of Design – Objects of Desire


- In an age of consumerism, how a mass produced object can become personal?
- Mass produced objects are no different from the luxury items
- Post war, modern people, unlike before now have the opportunity to own – makes them feel fulfilled, happy
- Design isn’t anymore about practicality or functionality, it’s fashion
- Cultural upgrade – takes away design from its ability to connect form and function and uses it simply as a selling tool – or is it a way to redefine the meaning of function?
- IKEA – has to be flat and brought in a brown box – completely transforms how we actually consume design
- Curious, that how in an age of individualism, such depersonalized consumer experience (IKEA) should become so successful
- Computer – the beginning of a new age, where the words personal and computer were no longer separate – the interface
- A good design is the one who doesn’t show you how it was designed or how hard it was, it’s all about what it gives you
- Design is doing so much for us, but does it have to?
- Radical design – a response to a global crisis – a collective chair, where parts are not hybrids, but instead stand of their own – the whole chair could be taken apart and brought back together, back into the cycle of industry – no down cycle, cradle to cradle design – Think Chair
- Cradle to cradle allows us to celebrate consumption, rather than fear it could trash/destroy our world

The Genius of Design Better – Living through Chemistry


- One of the most durable materials of 20th century – plastic
- Braun – new design approach, where decoration are brought to minimum – form should fallow function
- Simplicity is philosophy, it possesses a beauty of its own
- New graphic design system changes England’s road signs fundamentally – simplicity and clarity
- Low coast, universal, stackable chair replaces the common wooden alternative
- Plastic liberated and gave numerous opportunities to design freely
- Plastic changed society, a complete shift in generation passing – furniture didn’t need to be inherited any more
- The S Chair – the first chair that didn’t try to mimic any other, a completely new chair
- The S chair brought a revolution – a total new beginning, everything is possible, nothing relates to the past
- A new style – the mobile lifestyle, the whole concept of making things smaller – electronics
- The new generations – you can take your life out with you
- Walkman – not just a device/design, a new reality, new experiences
- The moment of realization – plastic is toxic – it looks great, but it ages badly
- The Monoblock chair, formed from a single type of plastic – functional, versatile and cheap. Very successful, but nobody likes it
- A world transformed by plastic, so much that we don’t even see it anymore without it
- Plastic – pure human intelligence – peak of man made products

Friday, February 11, 2011

Is there are way of deciding, when there are varying interpretations of a work of art, which one is correct? (or is there such a thing as correct interpretation)


Interpretations are based on various facts: point of views, experiences, culture, etc. They in turn depend on location - Where did that person came from? Our surroundings affect our interpretations on aesthetic matters, gives us different understanding of how things should look or behave. 

The interpretation on an object of an Englishmen would be quite different from the one of an Russian national. Therefor, render them both incorrect or personally/locally correct

The Genius of Design - Blueprints for War


- War time accelerates design process, industrial process, the process of creating machines, objects
- 2nd world war – clash of politics and ideology – heart of which was a brutal design process
- Innovation against industrial muscle


- From the beginning, nobody tough about design more than the Nazis, from their leading in 1933, they retooled Germany into a military machine
- They managed to concern Europe with such speed and easy because of a very sophisticated design
- Germany was not always famous for its industrial advantages, before they had a reputation that states “everything that comes from Germany is just bad”
- Founded in 1907, the Douche work group was committed to redefine the meaning of “made in Germany”
- An industrial standard unit was set up, which meant that industry would be standardized in size of steps – the size of paper, filing cabinets, etc.
- By 1933, in place was a very secure sense, that standardization in design, a function approach to rational organization of industry, became integral to public and private life, even if the German citizen wasn't aware of it

 
- There is no other product , that it is as complex, as simple to use as the car
- 1936, prototype for a new car was engineered (Ferdinand Porsche) – The Beetle, from fallows function – represents the German pursuit of excellence
- Germans realized, that design is about communication and this car convey a carefully calculated political message – on his birthday Hitler states, that he has given the people The Beetle, so they should give him his vote

 
- Threaten by invasion, Britain was forced to rethink its design, they were in desperate need of machine guns
- 12 of December 1940, Harold Jon Turpin designed The Sten Gun – nothing of this gun was forged of machined with expensive tools, it was fabricated. His second edition – The Mark Two Sten Gun, easy to assemble and use, it was a flat pat submachine gun, coast 2 pounds 2 shillings to make

 
- Lines Brothers, makers of toys, began manufacturing Sten Gun parts in 1941
- Founder and toy designer Walter Line sow ways to improve the gun, he redesigned it completely, without any previous experience. Thanks to him, the number of parts was reduced from 69 to 48 and production lowered further
- Due to the make do and man approach, perfectionism was left aside and The Sten Gun was disliked by many, it jammed on critical moments, misfire and their aim was repetitively less than true

 
- Design is different than art. When designing for industrial production there is always a clock ticking, always constraints, but those constraints could energize the process
- Mosquito Aircraft, was made almost entirely of plywood, using the furniture industry, which was spread over the country in small and tiny workshops (safe from bombing), already providing the skills needed

 
- Just like the Nazis, Britain needed a propaganda machine too – to explain, exhort and motivate, when the things weren't going so well
- They turned to graphic design (posters) in order to convey their message of safety and prevention to people

 
- While Britain relied on improvisation and native or imported genius, Germany continued its quest for victory through the relentless pursuit of quality. Hitler was convinced that only trough developing a master race of weapons, he would gain victory, an ideology embodied by a fearsome military machine, unleashed on allied forces in 1943 – The Tiger 1 Tank
- The Tiger was a result of design competition, initiated by Hitler between people’s car designer Ferdinand Porsche and engineering firm Henschel – in this case engineering muscle prevailed over design brilliance

 
- There was tradition in German design, that the most sophisticated was the best – this meant the consumption of more resources, time and engineering muscle
- The Russian came up with a completely different design – the T 34, a very simple and cheap to produce tank, numbers of which reached 60’000 in 2nd world war (The Tiger – 1300). The clash of these two weapons, The Tiger and T 34 represented the clash of two different design philosophies – quantity has a quality of its own (Stalin)

 
- Design is a process, not a style. When you’re designing, you don’t think only of the end product, but how are you going to make the thing too
- Ship builder, William Francis Gibbs proposed a design for a cargo ship, that could be mass produced – prefabricated steel parts, welded together on a Ford style production line, meant that Liberty ship could be produced faster and cheaper than ever thought possible

 
- What did the ways of the war have to offer to a post war world? Charles Eames began to experiment with plywood, trying to manipulate it to bend in 3 dimensions; he found his solution in war designs. He didn't only want to produce a chair, he wanted to produce it in numbers and process of being able to reproduce that piece of work over and over again was as important as the piece itself.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Design Principles

Balance 
Proportion 
Rhythm 
Emphasis 
Emphasis 
Unity 
Line 
Shape 
Shape 
Color 
Color 
Space 
Texture